POPE FRANCIS: BLESS THE PERSONS, NOT THE UNION

I read the Pope’s talk to the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith I don’t know how many times to see if the content, his words matched the title of this Vatican news article. Did the Pope today give a command or make a suggestion with “Bless the persons, not the union”?  Or is that title a take on the Holy Father’s actual words? Perception?

I ask because, as you read this Vatican summary, you will see words at the end that I have emphasized in bold (something I never do with a papal speech).

For example: Secondly, he noted, “when a couple spontaneously approaches [a minister] and asks for them, he is not blessing the union, but simply the people who together have requested it.”

For me this is all about perception. Does Francis know (I’ve asked this countless times) that, for millions around the globe, perception is reality? Two people approach (a minister) and ask to be blessed. They are together – the key word, together.  The priest is blessing two people together. The perception is that he is blessing a couple, a union.

The Pope did not specify but if the two people are a same sex couple, what is being blessed?  Obviously I want to clarify that if the priest calls each person individually by name and blesses them individually, that would seem to meet DDF standards. But will we ever know that unless a couple tells us.

POPE FRANCIS: BLESS THE PERSONS, NOT THE UNION

In an address to the plenary assembly of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Pope Francis discusses the Sacraments, human dignity, evangelisation, and Fiducia supplicans.

Joseph Tulloch (Vatican news)

Pope Francis addressed the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith on Friday, as the department brought its annual plenary assembly to a close.

Thanking officials for their “precious work”, the Pope recalled that, in his 2022 reform of the Roman Curia, he divided the Dicastery into two sections, one concerned with Doctrine and the other with Discipline. (2022 Vatican photo)

It was the former subject, the Pope said, that he wanted to touch on in his address, and he offered a number of thoughts organised around three words: ‘Sacraments’, ‘dignity’, and ‘faith’.

New document from DDF
The first word that Pope Francis touched on in his address was ‘Sacraments’.

The Sacraments, he said, “feed and make grow the life of the Church”, he said, and thus require “special care” on the part of those who administer them.

“Let us,” the Pope urged the DDF officials, “love and cherish the beauty and saving power of the Sacraments!”

Pope Francis then moved on to discuss dignity, noting that the DDF is “working on a document on this subject.“

“I hope,” he said, “that it will help us, as a Church, to always be close to all those who, without fanfare, in concrete daily life, fight and personally pay the price for defending the rights of those who are disregarded.”

Proclaiming the Gospel today
The Pope’s third subject, faith, was the one he dwelt on for the longest period.

“We cannot hide the fact,” he said, ”that in large areas of the planet, faith, as Benedict XVI put it, no longer constitutes an obvious prerequisite for common living.”

Indeed, Pope Francis noted, faith is often “denied, mocked, marginalised, and ridiculed.”

The proclamation and communication of faith in today’s world, he said, must therefore take a number of factors into account.

In particular, Pope Francis specified the “new urban cultures, with their many challenges but also the unprecedented questions of meaning they raise,” the need for “missionary conversion of ecclesial structures,” and, finally, “the centrality of kerygma [‘proclamation’] in the life and mission of the Church.”

“It is here,” the Pope said, “that help is expected from this Dicastery.”

Pastoral blessings
It was “in this context of evangelisation,” Pope Francis continued, that he wanted to mention the recent Declaration Fiducia supplicans.

The purpose of the “pastoral and spontaneous blessings” discussed in the Declaration, the Pope stressed, is to “concretely show the closeness of the Lord and the Church to all those who, finding themselves in different situations, ask for help to continue—sometimes to begin—a journey of faith.”

In this regard, the Pope emphasized two points.

Firstly, he said, “these blessings, outside of any liturgical context and form, do not require moral perfection to be received.”

Secondly, he noted, “when a couple spontaneously approaches [a minister] and asks for them, he is not blessing the union, but simply the people who together have requested it.”

“Not the union,” the Pope stressed, “but the persons, naturally taking into account the context, sensitivities, the places where one lives, and the most appropriate ways to do it.”

In this regard, the Pope emphasized two points.

Firstly, he said, “these blessings, outside of any liturgical context and form, do not require moral perfection to be received.”

Secondly, he noted, “when a couple spontaneously approaches [a minister] and asks for them, he is not blessing the union, but simply the people who together have requested it.”

“Not the union,” the Pope stressed, “but the persons, naturally taking into account the context, sensitivities, the places where one lives and the most appropriate ways to do it.”

DICASTERY ISSUES CLARIFICATION OF FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS

What a fascinating development from the DDF, the former CDF, always known for its precision and clarity! On December 18, the DDF said, regarding its release that day of Fiducia supplicans, that “no further responses should be expected about possible ways to regulate details or practicalities regarding blessings of this type.” But that’s just what we got today! Five pages!

DICASTERY ISSUES CLARIFICATION OF FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS

Para 41 from the original release of Fiducia supplicans on December 18, 2023:

  1. What has been said in this Declaration regarding the blessings of same-sex couples is sufficient to guide the prudent and fatherly discernment of ordained ministers in this regard. Thus, beyond the guidance provided above, no further responses should be expected about possible ways to regulate details or practicalities regarding blessings of this type.[26]

Yet today the DDF – Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith – released this “further response” signed by Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, prefect and Mons. Armando Matteo, Secretary for the Doctrinal Section:

DICASTERY FOR DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH CLARIFIES APPLICATION OF ‘FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS’

In a statement signed by the Cardinal prefect and the secretary, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith clarifies that ‘Fiducia supplicans’ does not change the doctrine on marriage; that bishops are able to discern the application of the document according to context; and that pastoral blessings are not comparable to liturgical and ritualized blessings. The full text of the statement is presented below.

Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith

Press release concerning the reception of Fiducia supplicans

4 January 2024

We are writing this Press Release to help clarify the reception of Fiducia supplicans, while recommending at the same time a full and calm reading of the Declaration so as to better understand its meaning and purpose.

  1. Doctrine

The understandable statements of some Episcopal Conferences regarding the document Fiducia supplicans have the value of highlighting the need for a more extended period of pastoral reflection. What is expressed by these Episcopal Conferences cannot be interpreted as doctrinal opposition, because the document is clear and definitive about marriage and sexuality. There are several indisputable phrases in the Declaration that leave this in no doubt:

«This Declaration remains firm on the traditional doctrine of the Church about marriage, not allowing any type of liturgical rite or blessing similar to a liturgical rite that can create confusion». One acts in these situations of couples in irregular situations «without officially validating their status or changing in any way the Church’s perennial teaching on marriage» (Presentation).

«Therefore, rites and prayers that could create confusion between what constitutes marriage – which is the “exclusive, stable, and indissoluble union between a man and a woman, naturally open to the generation of children” – and what contradicts it are inadmissible. This conviction is grounded in the perennial Catholic doctrine of marriage; it is only in this context that sexual relations find their natural, proper, and fully human meaning. The Church’s doctrine on this point remains firm» (4).

«Such is also the meaning of the Responsum of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which states that the Church does not have the power to impart blessings on unions of persons of the same sex» (5).

«For this reason, since the Church has always considered only those sexual relations that are lived out within marriage to be morally licit, the Church does not have the power to confer its liturgical blessing when that would somehow offer a form of moral legitimacy to a union that presumes to be a marriage or to an extra-marital sexual practice» (11).

Evidently, there is no room to distance ourselves doctrinally from this Declaration or to consider it heretical, contrary to the Tradition of the Church or blasphemous.

TO CONTINUE WITH FULL TEXT: Dicastery for Doctrine of the Faith clarifies application of ‘Fiducia supplicans’ – Vatican News

 

 

AND SO WE ASK: WHO IS MAKING A MESS?

AND SO WE ASK: WHO IS MAKING A MESS?

I had no intention of posting anything but joyful Christmas messages these days but the following article is far too important to be overlooked at such a critical period in our Church.

A number of impressive critiques of Fiducia Supplicans (FS) have been written since Monday, December 18, when this Declaration from the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith was published. I am referring to those critiques that do not merely summarize this DDF document but critically take it apart for what its says, what it does not say and what it implies about “irregular situations” in relationships, especially same sex unions, to the great confusion of the faithful and of countless priests and bishops.

The words of Archbishop Charles J. Chaput, Special to First Things, and former archbishop of Philadelphia, in his piece, “The Cost of ‘Making a Mess’” are the very best of all those critiques. A man of great faith and clarity, of great love for the Church, he says of FS : “the document is a doubleminded exercise in simultaneously affirming and undercutting Catholic teaching on the nature of blessings and their application to “irregular” relationships.”

I need say no more about “The Cost of ‘Making a Mess’” because the archbishop says it all, beautifully, honestly, clearly. I might only note that the archbishop’s use of the expression ‘making a mess’ refers to words Pope Francis used at a World Youth Day when he told youth to “go out and make a mess.”

But we now ask: Who is making a Mess?

Read on…”The Cost of Making a Mess” by Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

One of the standards the Church uses to measure the quality of her leaders is a simple line from Scripture: “God is not the author of confusion but of peace” (1 Cor. 14:33). So it was for Paul. So it is now. So it is for local pastors and bishops, including the bishop of Rome. Confusion among the faithful can often be a matter of innocent individuals who hear but fail to understand the Word. Confused teachinghowever, is another matter. It’s never excusable. The transmission of Christian truth requires prudence and patience because humans are not machines. But it also demands clarity and consistency. Deliberate or persistent ambiguity—anything that fuels misunderstanding or seems to leave an opening for objectively sinful behavior—is not of God. And it inevitably results in damage to individual souls and to our common Church life.

I mention this for a reason. A Protestant friend of mine, a Reformation scholar, sent a text to his Catholic friends on December 18 with the news that “Francis has unleashed chaos in your communion.” He was referring to the text Fiducia Supplicans (“On the Pastoral Meaning of Blessings”). Rome’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF), led by Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández—a close colleague of Pope Francis—had just released it that day. The document is a doubleminded exercise in simultaneously affirming and undercutting Catholic teaching on the nature of blessings and their application to “irregular” relationships. And it was quickly interpreted as a significant change in Church practice. Father James Martin, a longtime advocate for LGBTQ concerns, was promptly photographed blessing a gay couple in a New York Times article that noted:

Father Martin had waited years for the privilege of saying such a prayer, however simple, out in the open.

 

“It was really nice,” [he] said on Tuesday, “to be able to do that publicly.”

 

The pope’s decision was greeted as a landmark victory by advocates for gay Catholics, who describe it as a significant gesture of openness and pastoral care, and a reminder that an institution whose age is measured in millenniums can change.

The Times article went on to acknowledge that “The decision does not overturn the church’s doctrine that marriage is between a man and a woman.” Nor does it “allow priests to perform same-sex marriages.” But the dominant flavor and underlying purpose of the article were captured best by the various gay men interviewed who spoke of the Church “com[ing] around” to the legitimacy of same-sex relationships, and same-sex couples “claiming our space.”

Where to begin?

First, a key role of the pope is to unify the Church, not divide her, especially on matters of faith and morals. He has a similar duty to unify the bishops and not divide them.

Second, an essential task of a loving pastor is to correct as well as accompany. Blessings should encourage, but also, when necessary, challenge. People in same-sex and other non-marital sexual unions need a challenging accompaniment from the Church. Popes, bishops, priests, and deacons are called by their vocations to be prophets as well as pastors. Pope Francis often seems to separate these roles while Jesus himself always embodied both in his ministry. His words to the woman caught in adultery were not simply “Your sins are forgiven” but also “Go and sin no more.”

To CONTINUE: The Cost of ‘Making a Mess’ (denvercatholic.org): The Cost of “Making a Mess” | Charles J. Chaput | First Things

CARDINAL MUELLER: FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS IS SELF-CONTRADICTORY

CARDINAL MUELLER: FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS IS SELF-CONTRADICTORY

As you will read in Pillar Catholic, Cardinal Gerhard Mueller in his essay for the Pillar,  says ‘Fiducia supplicans’ is ‘self-contradictory’.

Cardinal Mueller was prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith 2012 to 2017.

How can a Vatican document approved by the Pope be self-contradictory? He will explain but first, here is one way to understand two contradictory statements from the Vatican on one subject.

On Monday, December 18, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of Faith (DDF), with approval of Pope Francis, released the Declaration Fiducia Supplicans that said “it will be possible to bless same-sex couples but without any type of ritualization or offering the impression of a marriage. The doctrine regarding marriage does not change, and the blessing does not signify approval of the union. This gesture of pastoral closeness must avoid any elements that remotely resemble a marriage rite. The document explores the theme of blessings, distinguishing between ritual and liturgical ones, and spontaneous ones more akin to signs of popular devotion. It is precisely in this second category there is now consideration of the possibility of welcoming even those who do not live according to the norms of Christian moral doctrine but humbly request to be blessed.” (https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2023-12/fiducia-supplicans-doctrine-faith-blessing-irregular-couples.html)

The document caused much confusion in the universal Church precisely because, in March of 2021, the Vatican, noted many articies in the media, declared that the Catholic Church won’t bless same-sex unions since God “cannot bless sin.” The Vatican’s orthodoxy office, the then Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), issued a formal response to a question about whether Catholic clergy have the authority to bless gay unions. The answer, contained in a relatively brief explanation, approved by the Holy Father Francis, was “negative.”

So, one question to which there are two answers from the Vatican, a YES and a NO.

It is important to note that the CDF, now the DDF, has a new prefect since this past September.

And now, Cardinal Mueller’s analysis: https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/muller-fiducia-supplicans-is-self