POPE FRANCIS CALLS CATHOLIC FAITHFUL IN GAZA PARISH – DISCORDANT VOICES INSIDE THE SYNOD

I found the piece (posted below) in La Croix International a fascinating look at the ongoing synod, principally because what Loup writes about dovetails with a lot of the stories I’ve heard come out of the synod. I’ve been in Rome so long that I have covered 9 of the 11 synods John Paul II called as well as those of his two successors.

I spoke about those years and the differences with recent synods on a podcast with Robert Royal: https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2023/10/16/podcast-vatican-info-then-and-now-with-joan-lewis/

POPE FRANCIS CALLS CATHOLIC FAITHFUL IN GAZA PARISH

Pope Francis makes a phone call to the parishioners of the Holy Family Catholic Parish in Gaza, with a religious sister expressing gratitude for his encouragement to the suffering community.
By Paolo Ondarza & Devin Watkins

“Pope Francis assured us that we are in his prayers and that he knows the suffering we are enduring.”

Sister Nabila Saleh of the Rosary Sisters of Jerusalem shared that summary of a phone call received from Pope Francis on Monday night.

The religious sister serves in the Holy Family Parish, the only Latin rite parish in Gaza.

In an interview with Vatican News, Sister Saleh said the Pope called the parish priest, Fr. Yusuf, who then handed her the phone “so I could speak directly with the Pope since [the priest] does not speak Italian very well.”

Pope’s concern for people of Gaza
She said Pope Francis wanted to know how many people are sheltering in the parish’s facilities.

“There are about 500 people, including the sick, families, children, the disabled, people who have lost their homes and belongings,” she said. “It was a great blessing to be able to speak with him. He gave us courage and support in prayer.”

Sr. Saleh asked the Pope to make an appeal for peace and told him that Catholics in Gaza are offering their sufferings “for an end to the war, for peace, for the needs of the Church, and for the ongoing Synod.”

“Our parishioners were very pleased,” she said. “They know that the Pope is working for peace and for the good of the Christian community in Gaza.”

Mutual support in times of trial
Asked about the situation in Gaza, Sr. Saleh said people are trying to support each other as much as possible in their difficulties and are praying earnestly for peace.

“Every day we have two Masses,” she said. “We also always pray the Rosary with the children and their families.”

On Sunday evening, the parish priest celebrated Mass and baptized a child into the Christian faith.

“The mother was afraid that something bad might happen and asked to baptize her son,” she said. “It was a moment of spiritual resurrection and rebirth for all of us.”

Appeal for peace and justice
Sr. Saleh wrapped up the interview with an appeal for peace and justice in Palestine.

“We want peace because war does no one any good. We want this brutal war to end,” she said. “Many people have lost their loved ones, their homes, and everything they have. We ask for justice: justice and peace. The Palestinian people also have the right to live. We ask not to punish the population because of a fanatic group. And then we ask that you pray for us.”

DISCORDANT VOICES INSIDE THE SYNOD

(From La Croix international – Loup Besmond de Senneville)
Not everyone who is participating in the Synod on synodality is pleased about the method being employed to guide the discussions.

The atmosphere of general enthusiasm that seems to surround the Synod assembly on the future of the Church now underway at the Vatican should not be taken at face value.

Over the past few days, a number of dissenting voices have been raised during the October 4-29 gathering that has brought together 365 synod fathers and mothers, including Pope Francis.

During the sessions – which are closed to the media and outsiders – some of the participants have clearly made known their doubts about the method being used. They have raised their concerns during the “free interventions” in the plenary meetings, in the small-group discussions at the round tables spread throughout in the Paul VI Audience Hall, and even more so during the coffee breaks.

“The level has dropped a lot”

This is particularly true of some of the old Synod hands, who are quick to point out that the main problem is that theology is being neglected during the discussions. The “conversation in the spirit” used during group work, the method introduced by the organizers, requires Synod members to speak about their personal experience, rather than to address major concepts – in short, it’s experience over ideas.

“The level has dropped a lot,” complained one Synod father, who is not taking it lying down. He said he feels “restricted”, even “infantilized”.

This is all the more true given that participants are limited to four-minute interventions both in small-group discussions and their plenary assembly interventions. From the outset, almost everyone has stayed within the limit. But a few have not, and were reminded by a bell that their time was up. They said the four-minute restriction makes it impossible to develop a theological thought.

In any case, the few theologians who have spoken since the Synod assembly began – such as German Cardinal Gerhard Müller and Italian Archbishop Bruno Forte – did not seem to arouse people’s enthusiasm. Nor did Cardinal Marc Ouellet, who took the opportunity to promote his work on the theology of the priesthood.

“The theologians’ speeches are pretty boring,” said on member who is participating in his first Synod assembly.

Annoying applause
Critics inside the Synod assembly say a second problem is that the emphasis is placed on emotion. From the outset, discussions have been prepped by numerous personal testimonies, some of them describing dramatic situations.

Such was the case of a Spanish layman and president of an association for people with disabilities who spoke on behalf of this whole section of society, which he felt was insufficiently integrated into the Church. Then there was a young woman who very movingly explained that her lesbian sister committed suicide after being rejected by the Church. The assembly’s youngest member – just 22 years of age – was also given the floor.

All of them were warmly applauded after they spoke. And that applause left some people in the assembly more than a little annoyed.

“It’s all testimony and emotion,” said one. “But that’s not what our faith is about. Jesus accepts everyone, but tells people to convert. To the adulteress he says: go and sin no more.”

The same critics have also complained of an overly “Western-centric” focus, so much so that themes touching on sexual morality and people “wounded” by the Church (a term used in the assembly’s working document) tend to dominate – as at the afternoon discussions on Thursday, October 12.

“After around fifteen contributions, there were still some forty people to get through. A few days earlier, when talking about ecumenism, there were no more than ten,” one member said.

A third sign of tension is the clear refusal of some participants to take part in the process. At least one participant left his table last Friday afternoon October 13, before the discussions had even begun. His reason? He realized that one of the other people in his small group was known to defend positions radically opposed to his own.

This might have been just an isolated incident, but it’s a sign that it’s not all smooth sailing at this Synod assembly.