NEW VATICAN DOCUMENT LISTS ‘GRAVE VIOLATIONS’ OF HUMAN DIGNITY

NEW VATICAN DOCUMENT LISTS ‘GRAVE VIOLATIONS’ OF HUMAN DIGNITY

The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s new document ‘Dignitas infinita’ took five years to complete, and builds on the papal magisterium of the last decade: from war to poverty, from violence against migrants to violence against women, from abortion to surrogate motherhood to euthanasia, from gender theory to digital violence.

By Andrea Tornielli (Vatican news)

Three chapters offer the foundations for the fourth, which is dedicated to “some grave violations of human dignity”.

That’s the structure of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s new Declaration Dignitas infinita, which commemorates the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and reaffirms “the indispensable nature of the dignity of the human person in Christian anthropology ” (Intro.)

The main novelty of the document, which is the fruit of five years’ work, is the inclusion of a number of key themes from the recent papal magisterium that accompany the bioethical ones. In the ‘non-exhaustive’ list that is offered, abortion, euthanasia and surrogate motherhood are listed as violations of human dignity alongside war, poverty and human trafficking.

The new text thus contributes to overcoming the dichotomy that exists between those who focus exclusively on beginning-and-end-of-life issues, while forgetting so many other attacks against human dignity and, conversely, those who focus only on defending the poor and migrants while forgetting that life must be defended from conception to its natural conclusion.

Photos by Daniel Ibanez, CNA/EWTN:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Fundamental Principles

The first three parts of the Declaration recall fundamental principles.

“In the light of Revelation, the Church resolutely reiterates and confirms” the “ontological dignity of the human person, created in the image and likeness of God and redeemed in Jesus Christ” (1).

This is an “inalienable dignity”, corresponding to “human nature apart from all cultural change”(6). It is a “gift” and therefore present in “an unborn child, an unconscious person, or an older person in distress (9).

“The Church proclaims the equal dignity of all people, regardless of their living conditions or qualities” (17), and she does so on the basis of biblical revelation: women and men are created in the image of God.

Christ, by becoming incarnate, “confirmed the dignity of the body and soul” (19), and, in His rising, revealed to us that man’s dignity man rests “above all on the fact that he is called to communion with God” (20).

The dignity of every person

The document highlights the misunderstandings of those who prefer the expression “personal dignity” to “human dignity”, “since they understand a person to be only ‘one who is capable of reasoning’” (24).

Thus, according to them, “the unborn child would not have personal dignity, nor would the older person who is dependent upon others, nor would an individual with mental disabilities.

On the contrary, the Church insists that the dignity of every human person, precisely because it is intrinsic, remains in all circumstances” (24).

Furthermore, the document stresses that “the concept of human dignity is also occasionally misused to justify an arbitrary proliferation of new rights … as if the ability to express and realize every individual preference or subjective desire should be guaranteed.” (25).

The list of violations

The Declaration then presents the list of “some grave violations of human dignity”.

This includes “all offences against life itself, such as murder, genocide, abortion, euthanasia, and willful suicide” must be recognized as contrary to human dignity “, but also “all violations of the integrity of the human person, such as mutilation, physical and mental torture, undue psychological pressures “.

And, finally, it includes “all offences against human dignity, such as subhuman living conditions, arbitrary imprisonment, deportation, slavery, prostitution, the selling of women and children, degrading working conditions where individuals are treated as mere tools for profit rather than free and responsible persons”.

The death penalty is also cited, since it “violates the inalienable dignity of every person, regardless of the circumstances” (34).

Poverty, war and human trafficking

The first issue mentioned is poverty, “one of the greatest injustices in the contemporary world” (36).

Then there is war, “another tragedy that denies human dignity”, and always a “defeat of humanity” (38), to the point that “it is very difficult nowadays to invoke the rational criteria elaborated in earlier centuries to speak of the possibility of a ‘just war.’”(39).

The Declaration also discusses the “travail of migrants”, whose “lives are put at risk because they no longer have the means to start a family, to work, or to feed themselves” (40).

The document then dwells on “human trafficking”, which is taking on “tragic dimensions” and is described as ” vile activity, a disgrace to our societies that claim to be civilized “. The Declaration invites “exploiters and clients” to make a serious examination of conscience (41).

Similarly, it calls for the fight against phenomena such as “the marketing of human organs and tissues, the sexual exploitation of boys and girls, slave labour, including prostitution, the drug and weapons trade, terrorism, and international organized crime” (42).

The document also mentions sexual abuse, which leaves “deep scars in the hearts of those who suffer it”: these are “sufferings that can last a lifetime and that no repentance can remedy” (43).

Discrimination and violence against women are then discussed. Among the latter are listed “coercive abortions, which affect both mother and child, often to satisfy the selfishness of males” and “the practice of polygamy” (45). Femicide is also condemned (46).

Abortion and surrogacy

The condemnation of abortion is strong: “Among all the crimes which can be committed against life, procured abortion has characteristics making it particularly serious and deplorable”, and reference is made to the fact that “defence of unborn life is closely linked to the defence of each and every other human right” (47).

The Declaration’s rejection of surrogacy, by means of which “the immensely worthy child becomes a mere object”, is also strong. This is a practice that “represents a grave violation of the dignity of the woman and the child …  A child is always a gift and never the basis of a commercial contract.” (48)

The list goes on to mention euthanasia and assisted suicide, confusingly defined by some laws as ” death with dignity”. The document stresses that “suffering does not cause the sick to lose their dignity, which is intrinsically and inalienably their own” (51).

The Declaration then speaks of the importance of palliative care and the avoidance of “aggressive treatments or disproportionate medical procedures”, reaffirming that “Life is a right, not death, which must be welcomed, not administered” (52).

A further serious violation of human dignity is the marginalization of differently-abled persons (53).

Gender theory

The document begins the section on this topic by stressing that “every sign of unjust discrimination” against homosexual persons “is to be carefully avoided, particularly any form of aggression and violence”.

It is “contrary to human dignity”, the Declaration says, that in some places “not a few people are “imprisoned, tortured and even deprived of the good of life solely because of their sexual orientation” (55).

Gender theory, which is “extremely dangerous since it cancels differences in its claim to make everyone equal”, is then criticised (56).

The Church, we read, recalls that “human life in all its dimensions, both physical and spiritual, is a gift from God. This gift is to be accepted with gratitude and placed at the service of the good. Desiring a personal self-determination, as gender theory prescribes … amounts to a concession to the age-old temptation to make oneself God” (57).

Gender theory “intends to deny the greatest possible difference that exists between living beings: sexual difference” (58).

Therefore, ” all attempts to obscure reference to the ineliminable sexual difference between man and woman” are “to be rejected” (59).

Sex change is also judged negatively since it “risks threatening the unique dignity the person has received from the moment of conception”. This does not mean, however, excluding the possibility that “a person with genital abnormalities that are already evident at birth or that develop later may choose to receive the assistance of healthcare professionals to resolve these abnormalities” (60).

Digital violence

The final item on the list is “digital violence”.

“New forms of violence are spreading through social media”, we read, such as cyberbullying, and “the internet is also a channel for spreading pornography and the exploitation of persons for sexual purposes or through gambling” (61).

The Declaration ends by urging that “respect for the dignity of the human person beyond all circumstances be placed at the centre of the commitment to the common good and at the centre of every legal system” (64).

You can find the full text of the Declaration Dignitas infinita on the Holy See website.

 

POPE FRANCIS: BLESS THE PERSONS, NOT THE UNION

I read the Pope’s talk to the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith I don’t know how many times to see if the content, his words matched the title of this Vatican news article. Did the Pope today give a command or make a suggestion with “Bless the persons, not the union”?  Or is that title a take on the Holy Father’s actual words? Perception?

I ask because, as you read this Vatican summary, you will see words at the end that I have emphasized in bold (something I never do with a papal speech).

For example: Secondly, he noted, “when a couple spontaneously approaches [a minister] and asks for them, he is not blessing the union, but simply the people who together have requested it.”

For me this is all about perception. Does Francis know (I’ve asked this countless times) that, for millions around the globe, perception is reality? Two people approach (a minister) and ask to be blessed. They are together – the key word, together.  The priest is blessing two people together. The perception is that he is blessing a couple, a union.

The Pope did not specify but if the two people are a same sex couple, what is being blessed?  Obviously I want to clarify that if the priest calls each person individually by name and blesses them individually, that would seem to meet DDF standards. But will we ever know that unless a couple tells us.

POPE FRANCIS: BLESS THE PERSONS, NOT THE UNION

In an address to the plenary assembly of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Pope Francis discusses the Sacraments, human dignity, evangelisation, and Fiducia supplicans.

Joseph Tulloch (Vatican news)

Pope Francis addressed the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith on Friday, as the department brought its annual plenary assembly to a close.

Thanking officials for their “precious work”, the Pope recalled that, in his 2022 reform of the Roman Curia, he divided the Dicastery into two sections, one concerned with Doctrine and the other with Discipline. (2022 Vatican photo)

It was the former subject, the Pope said, that he wanted to touch on in his address, and he offered a number of thoughts organised around three words: ‘Sacraments’, ‘dignity’, and ‘faith’.

New document from DDF
The first word that Pope Francis touched on in his address was ‘Sacraments’.

The Sacraments, he said, “feed and make grow the life of the Church”, he said, and thus require “special care” on the part of those who administer them.

“Let us,” the Pope urged the DDF officials, “love and cherish the beauty and saving power of the Sacraments!”

Pope Francis then moved on to discuss dignity, noting that the DDF is “working on a document on this subject.“

“I hope,” he said, “that it will help us, as a Church, to always be close to all those who, without fanfare, in concrete daily life, fight and personally pay the price for defending the rights of those who are disregarded.”

Proclaiming the Gospel today
The Pope’s third subject, faith, was the one he dwelt on for the longest period.

“We cannot hide the fact,” he said, ”that in large areas of the planet, faith, as Benedict XVI put it, no longer constitutes an obvious prerequisite for common living.”

Indeed, Pope Francis noted, faith is often “denied, mocked, marginalised, and ridiculed.”

The proclamation and communication of faith in today’s world, he said, must therefore take a number of factors into account.

In particular, Pope Francis specified the “new urban cultures, with their many challenges but also the unprecedented questions of meaning they raise,” the need for “missionary conversion of ecclesial structures,” and, finally, “the centrality of kerygma [‘proclamation’] in the life and mission of the Church.”

“It is here,” the Pope said, “that help is expected from this Dicastery.”

Pastoral blessings
It was “in this context of evangelisation,” Pope Francis continued, that he wanted to mention the recent Declaration Fiducia supplicans.

The purpose of the “pastoral and spontaneous blessings” discussed in the Declaration, the Pope stressed, is to “concretely show the closeness of the Lord and the Church to all those who, finding themselves in different situations, ask for help to continue—sometimes to begin—a journey of faith.”

In this regard, the Pope emphasized two points.

Firstly, he said, “these blessings, outside of any liturgical context and form, do not require moral perfection to be received.”

Secondly, he noted, “when a couple spontaneously approaches [a minister] and asks for them, he is not blessing the union, but simply the people who together have requested it.”

“Not the union,” the Pope stressed, “but the persons, naturally taking into account the context, sensitivities, the places where one lives, and the most appropriate ways to do it.”

In this regard, the Pope emphasized two points.

Firstly, he said, “these blessings, outside of any liturgical context and form, do not require moral perfection to be received.”

Secondly, he noted, “when a couple spontaneously approaches [a minister] and asks for them, he is not blessing the union, but simply the people who together have requested it.”

“Not the union,” the Pope stressed, “but the persons, naturally taking into account the context, sensitivities, the places where one lives and the most appropriate ways to do it.”

DICASTERY ISSUES CLARIFICATION OF FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS

What a fascinating development from the DDF, the former CDF, always known for its precision and clarity! On December 18, the DDF said, regarding its release that day of Fiducia supplicans, that “no further responses should be expected about possible ways to regulate details or practicalities regarding blessings of this type.” But that’s just what we got today! Five pages!

DICASTERY ISSUES CLARIFICATION OF FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS

Para 41 from the original release of Fiducia supplicans on December 18, 2023:

  1. What has been said in this Declaration regarding the blessings of same-sex couples is sufficient to guide the prudent and fatherly discernment of ordained ministers in this regard. Thus, beyond the guidance provided above, no further responses should be expected about possible ways to regulate details or practicalities regarding blessings of this type.[26]

Yet today the DDF – Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith – released this “further response” signed by Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, prefect and Mons. Armando Matteo, Secretary for the Doctrinal Section:

DICASTERY FOR DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH CLARIFIES APPLICATION OF ‘FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS’

In a statement signed by the Cardinal prefect and the secretary, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith clarifies that ‘Fiducia supplicans’ does not change the doctrine on marriage; that bishops are able to discern the application of the document according to context; and that pastoral blessings are not comparable to liturgical and ritualized blessings. The full text of the statement is presented below.

Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith

Press release concerning the reception of Fiducia supplicans

4 January 2024

We are writing this Press Release to help clarify the reception of Fiducia supplicans, while recommending at the same time a full and calm reading of the Declaration so as to better understand its meaning and purpose.

  1. Doctrine

The understandable statements of some Episcopal Conferences regarding the document Fiducia supplicans have the value of highlighting the need for a more extended period of pastoral reflection. What is expressed by these Episcopal Conferences cannot be interpreted as doctrinal opposition, because the document is clear and definitive about marriage and sexuality. There are several indisputable phrases in the Declaration that leave this in no doubt:

«This Declaration remains firm on the traditional doctrine of the Church about marriage, not allowing any type of liturgical rite or blessing similar to a liturgical rite that can create confusion». One acts in these situations of couples in irregular situations «without officially validating their status or changing in any way the Church’s perennial teaching on marriage» (Presentation).

«Therefore, rites and prayers that could create confusion between what constitutes marriage – which is the “exclusive, stable, and indissoluble union between a man and a woman, naturally open to the generation of children” – and what contradicts it are inadmissible. This conviction is grounded in the perennial Catholic doctrine of marriage; it is only in this context that sexual relations find their natural, proper, and fully human meaning. The Church’s doctrine on this point remains firm» (4).

«Such is also the meaning of the Responsum of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which states that the Church does not have the power to impart blessings on unions of persons of the same sex» (5).

«For this reason, since the Church has always considered only those sexual relations that are lived out within marriage to be morally licit, the Church does not have the power to confer its liturgical blessing when that would somehow offer a form of moral legitimacy to a union that presumes to be a marriage or to an extra-marital sexual practice» (11).

Evidently, there is no room to distance ourselves doctrinally from this Declaration or to consider it heretical, contrary to the Tradition of the Church or blasphemous.

TO CONTINUE WITH FULL TEXT: Dicastery for Doctrine of the Faith clarifies application of ‘Fiducia supplicans’ – Vatican News

 

 

CARDINAL MUELLER: FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS IS SELF-CONTRADICTORY

CARDINAL MUELLER: FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS IS SELF-CONTRADICTORY

As you will read in Pillar Catholic, Cardinal Gerhard Mueller in his essay for the Pillar,  says ‘Fiducia supplicans’ is ‘self-contradictory’.

Cardinal Mueller was prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith 2012 to 2017.

How can a Vatican document approved by the Pope be self-contradictory? He will explain but first, here is one way to understand two contradictory statements from the Vatican on one subject.

On Monday, December 18, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of Faith (DDF), with approval of Pope Francis, released the Declaration Fiducia Supplicans that said “it will be possible to bless same-sex couples but without any type of ritualization or offering the impression of a marriage. The doctrine regarding marriage does not change, and the blessing does not signify approval of the union. This gesture of pastoral closeness must avoid any elements that remotely resemble a marriage rite. The document explores the theme of blessings, distinguishing between ritual and liturgical ones, and spontaneous ones more akin to signs of popular devotion. It is precisely in this second category there is now consideration of the possibility of welcoming even those who do not live according to the norms of Christian moral doctrine but humbly request to be blessed.” (https://www.vaticannews.va/en/vatican-city/news/2023-12/fiducia-supplicans-doctrine-faith-blessing-irregular-couples.html)

The document caused much confusion in the universal Church precisely because, in March of 2021, the Vatican, noted many articies in the media, declared that the Catholic Church won’t bless same-sex unions since God “cannot bless sin.” The Vatican’s orthodoxy office, the then Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), issued a formal response to a question about whether Catholic clergy have the authority to bless gay unions. The answer, contained in a relatively brief explanation, approved by the Holy Father Francis, was “negative.”

So, one question to which there are two answers from the Vatican, a YES and a NO.

It is important to note that the CDF, now the DDF, has a new prefect since this past September.

And now, Cardinal Mueller’s analysis: https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/muller-fiducia-supplicans-is-self

BLESSING GAY UNIONS – THEN … 2021 VATICAN BARS GAY UNION BLESSING, SAYS GOD ‘CAN’T BLESS SIN’ – NOW … 2023 DOCTRINAL DECLARATION OPENS POSSIBILITY TO BLESS COUPLES IN IRREGULAR SITUATIONS

And we wonder why people are confused about Church doctrine! All one has to do is go online, listen to the radio or watch TV to see the spin on today’s breaking news from the Vatican.  IE: New York Times: Pope Francis Allows Priests to Bless Same-Sex Relationships.

Today’s document uses the words “Couples in Irregular Situations” and that includes same sex unions.

The speed with which this Vatican declaration hit the newsstands today, so to speak, was remarkable!

The Declaration “Fiducia supplicans”  is not yet on the webpage of the Dicastery for Doctrine of the Faith but when it is up, I’ll let you know. Or you can check via the following link: https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/doc_doc_index.htm

How many will read the fine print in that document that defines marriage, defines union, differentiates between the two ,and explains when and how a ‘blessing’ may be given?

Here is a key sentence from the Vatican news story: “The doctrine regarding marriage does not change, and the blessing does not signify approval of the union.” My question is: Why would you bless something you do not approve of?!

I would guess that one item is now off the agenda for the October 2024 Synod on Synodality – even if the Vatican only recently asked pastors, especially bishops, for more input for the synod!

In fact, on December 11, just one week ago, the Synod of Bishops published the following document:  “GENERAL SECRETARIAT OF THE SYNOD, XVI ORDINARY GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE SYNOD OF BISHOPS – Towards October 2024”: https://www.synod.va/content/dam/synod/news/2023-12-12_towards-2024/ENG_Document_TOWARDS-OCTOBER-2024_XVI_II-Session.pdf

BLESSING GAY UNIONS

THEN … 2021

VATICAN BARS GAY UNION BLESSING, SAYS GOD ‘CAN’T BLESS SIN’

BY NICOLE WINFIELD
Published 6:22 PM CET, March 15, 2021

ROME (AP) — The Vatican declared Monday that the Catholic Church won’t bless same-sex unions since God “cannot bless sin.”

The Vatican’s orthodoxy office, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued a formal response to a question about whether Catholic clergy have the authority to bless gay unions. The answer, contained in a two-page explanation published in seven languages and approved by Pope Francis, was “negative.”

The note distinguished between the church’s welcoming and blessing of gay people, which it upheld, but not their unions. It argued that such unions are not part of God’s plan and that any sacramental recognition of them could be confused with marriage. (https://apnews.com/article/vatican-decree-same-sex-unions-cannot-bless-sin-077944750c975313ad253328e4cf7443)

JESUIT ARTIST FATHER RUPNIK’S MINISTRY RESTRICTED FOLLOWING REPORTS OF ABUSE ALLEGATIONS

JESUIT ARTIST FATHER RUPNIK’S MINISTRY RESTRICTED FOLLOWING REPORTS OF ABUSE ALLEGATIONS

(CNA – December 5, 2022 – Hannah Brockhaus)

A prominent Jesuit priest and artist had his ministry restricted, reportedly after an investigation by his religious order into allegations of abuse against religious sisters in Slovenia.

The Jesuits said in a statement dated Dec. 2 that the order has barred 68-year-old Father Marko Ivan Rupnik, SJ, from hearing confessions or conducting spiritual direction since the Vatican received a complaint against him in 2021.

The Vatican declined in October to carry out a canonical process due to the statute of limitations, the order said. The complaint did not include minors.

The Jesuit order said the restrictions on Rupnik’s ministry were still in effect and included a ban on leading the Ignatian Spiritual Exercises. The priest is also prohibited from engaging in public activities without the permission of his superior.

Rupnik, the director of the Centro Aletti in Rome, was the creator of the official image of the 2022 World Meeting of Families, and for over 30 years has designed mosaic artworks for chapels, churches, and shrines around the world.

The Jesuit is best known for overseeing the renovation of the Redemptoris Mater Chapel in the Vatican’s Apostolic Palace, which reopened in 1999 after three years of work.

Rupnik also designed the Redemptor Hominis Church at the St. John Paul II National Shrine in Washington, D.C., as well as other projects in the U.S.

Despite the restrictions on his public ministry, on Nov. 30, Rupnik received an honorary doctorate from the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná in Brazil.

The Centro Aletti has also continued to publish a video on YouTube every Sunday of Rupnik commenting on the Sunday Gospel. The Diocese of Rome posted a video of Rupnik speaking about eucharistic adoration in February.

According to the Jesuits, the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) asked the order to conduct a preliminary investigation into the Slovenian priest, who has been incardinated in the Diocese of Rome since the early 1990s.

Father Marko Rupnik, SJ, in an interview with EWTN in 2020. | EWTN:

A final report was submitted to the DDF, and in early October, the Vatican “found that the facts in question” fell outside the statute of limitations, the Jesuits said.

A source in the Diocese of Rome confirmed Dec. 5 to ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish partner agency, that the provincial of the Jesuits had informed the diocese of the precautionary measures against Rupnik and suggested that his pastoral activities in the diocese be limited.

The Diocese of Rome did not perform its own investigation into the allegations against Rupnik, the source said, since the accusations concerned alleged abuse in Slovenia, not in Rome.

The source also confirmed that Rome auxiliary Bishop Daniele Libanori had conducted a separate inquiry, unrelated to Rupnik, into the Loyola Community, which was founded in Slovenia.

During the canonical visitation, which is still ongoing, Libanori received accusations from at least nine women against Rupnik, the source said. Rupnik was reportedly the community’s confessor and spiritual director for a number of years.

Run by law and religion scholars, the Italian website “Silere non possum,” Latin for “I cannot keep quiet,” published a story with reports that Rupnik had abused consecrated women in the Loyola Community.