NEW VATICAN DOCUMENT LISTS ‘GRAVE VIOLATIONS’ OF HUMAN DIGNITY

NEW VATICAN DOCUMENT LISTS ‘GRAVE VIOLATIONS’ OF HUMAN DIGNITY

The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s new document ‘Dignitas infinita’ took five years to complete, and builds on the papal magisterium of the last decade: from war to poverty, from violence against migrants to violence against women, from abortion to surrogate motherhood to euthanasia, from gender theory to digital violence.

By Andrea Tornielli (Vatican news)

Three chapters offer the foundations for the fourth, which is dedicated to “some grave violations of human dignity”.

That’s the structure of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s new Declaration Dignitas infinita, which commemorates the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and reaffirms “the indispensable nature of the dignity of the human person in Christian anthropology ” (Intro.)

The main novelty of the document, which is the fruit of five years’ work, is the inclusion of a number of key themes from the recent papal magisterium that accompany the bioethical ones. In the ‘non-exhaustive’ list that is offered, abortion, euthanasia and surrogate motherhood are listed as violations of human dignity alongside war, poverty and human trafficking.

The new text thus contributes to overcoming the dichotomy that exists between those who focus exclusively on beginning-and-end-of-life issues, while forgetting so many other attacks against human dignity and, conversely, those who focus only on defending the poor and migrants while forgetting that life must be defended from conception to its natural conclusion.

Photos by Daniel Ibanez, CNA/EWTN:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Fundamental Principles

The first three parts of the Declaration recall fundamental principles.

“In the light of Revelation, the Church resolutely reiterates and confirms” the “ontological dignity of the human person, created in the image and likeness of God and redeemed in Jesus Christ” (1).

This is an “inalienable dignity”, corresponding to “human nature apart from all cultural change”(6). It is a “gift” and therefore present in “an unborn child, an unconscious person, or an older person in distress (9).

“The Church proclaims the equal dignity of all people, regardless of their living conditions or qualities” (17), and she does so on the basis of biblical revelation: women and men are created in the image of God.

Christ, by becoming incarnate, “confirmed the dignity of the body and soul” (19), and, in His rising, revealed to us that man’s dignity man rests “above all on the fact that he is called to communion with God” (20).

The dignity of every person

The document highlights the misunderstandings of those who prefer the expression “personal dignity” to “human dignity”, “since they understand a person to be only ‘one who is capable of reasoning’” (24).

Thus, according to them, “the unborn child would not have personal dignity, nor would the older person who is dependent upon others, nor would an individual with mental disabilities.

On the contrary, the Church insists that the dignity of every human person, precisely because it is intrinsic, remains in all circumstances” (24).

Furthermore, the document stresses that “the concept of human dignity is also occasionally misused to justify an arbitrary proliferation of new rights … as if the ability to express and realize every individual preference or subjective desire should be guaranteed.” (25).

The list of violations

The Declaration then presents the list of “some grave violations of human dignity”.

This includes “all offences against life itself, such as murder, genocide, abortion, euthanasia, and willful suicide” must be recognized as contrary to human dignity “, but also “all violations of the integrity of the human person, such as mutilation, physical and mental torture, undue psychological pressures “.

And, finally, it includes “all offences against human dignity, such as subhuman living conditions, arbitrary imprisonment, deportation, slavery, prostitution, the selling of women and children, degrading working conditions where individuals are treated as mere tools for profit rather than free and responsible persons”.

The death penalty is also cited, since it “violates the inalienable dignity of every person, regardless of the circumstances” (34).

Poverty, war and human trafficking

The first issue mentioned is poverty, “one of the greatest injustices in the contemporary world” (36).

Then there is war, “another tragedy that denies human dignity”, and always a “defeat of humanity” (38), to the point that “it is very difficult nowadays to invoke the rational criteria elaborated in earlier centuries to speak of the possibility of a ‘just war.’”(39).

The Declaration also discusses the “travail of migrants”, whose “lives are put at risk because they no longer have the means to start a family, to work, or to feed themselves” (40).

The document then dwells on “human trafficking”, which is taking on “tragic dimensions” and is described as ” vile activity, a disgrace to our societies that claim to be civilized “. The Declaration invites “exploiters and clients” to make a serious examination of conscience (41).

Similarly, it calls for the fight against phenomena such as “the marketing of human organs and tissues, the sexual exploitation of boys and girls, slave labour, including prostitution, the drug and weapons trade, terrorism, and international organized crime” (42).

The document also mentions sexual abuse, which leaves “deep scars in the hearts of those who suffer it”: these are “sufferings that can last a lifetime and that no repentance can remedy” (43).

Discrimination and violence against women are then discussed. Among the latter are listed “coercive abortions, which affect both mother and child, often to satisfy the selfishness of males” and “the practice of polygamy” (45). Femicide is also condemned (46).

Abortion and surrogacy

The condemnation of abortion is strong: “Among all the crimes which can be committed against life, procured abortion has characteristics making it particularly serious and deplorable”, and reference is made to the fact that “defence of unborn life is closely linked to the defence of each and every other human right” (47).

The Declaration’s rejection of surrogacy, by means of which “the immensely worthy child becomes a mere object”, is also strong. This is a practice that “represents a grave violation of the dignity of the woman and the child …  A child is always a gift and never the basis of a commercial contract.” (48)

The list goes on to mention euthanasia and assisted suicide, confusingly defined by some laws as ” death with dignity”. The document stresses that “suffering does not cause the sick to lose their dignity, which is intrinsically and inalienably their own” (51).

The Declaration then speaks of the importance of palliative care and the avoidance of “aggressive treatments or disproportionate medical procedures”, reaffirming that “Life is a right, not death, which must be welcomed, not administered” (52).

A further serious violation of human dignity is the marginalization of differently-abled persons (53).

Gender theory

The document begins the section on this topic by stressing that “every sign of unjust discrimination” against homosexual persons “is to be carefully avoided, particularly any form of aggression and violence”.

It is “contrary to human dignity”, the Declaration says, that in some places “not a few people are “imprisoned, tortured and even deprived of the good of life solely because of their sexual orientation” (55).

Gender theory, which is “extremely dangerous since it cancels differences in its claim to make everyone equal”, is then criticised (56).

The Church, we read, recalls that “human life in all its dimensions, both physical and spiritual, is a gift from God. This gift is to be accepted with gratitude and placed at the service of the good. Desiring a personal self-determination, as gender theory prescribes … amounts to a concession to the age-old temptation to make oneself God” (57).

Gender theory “intends to deny the greatest possible difference that exists between living beings: sexual difference” (58).

Therefore, ” all attempts to obscure reference to the ineliminable sexual difference between man and woman” are “to be rejected” (59).

Sex change is also judged negatively since it “risks threatening the unique dignity the person has received from the moment of conception”. This does not mean, however, excluding the possibility that “a person with genital abnormalities that are already evident at birth or that develop later may choose to receive the assistance of healthcare professionals to resolve these abnormalities” (60).

Digital violence

The final item on the list is “digital violence”.

“New forms of violence are spreading through social media”, we read, such as cyberbullying, and “the internet is also a channel for spreading pornography and the exploitation of persons for sexual purposes or through gambling” (61).

The Declaration ends by urging that “respect for the dignity of the human person beyond all circumstances be placed at the centre of the commitment to the common good and at the centre of every legal system” (64).

You can find the full text of the Declaration Dignitas infinita on the Holy See website.

 

CARDINAL FERNANDEZ RESPONDS TO CONCERNS BY ABUSE SURVIVORS ABOUT ASTONISHING BOOK

CARDINAL FERNANDEZ RESPONDS TO CONCERNS BY ABUSE SURVIVORS ABOUT ASTONISHING BOOK

AN EXCERPT: In a Feb. 2 email, Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, head of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, responded to several questions from OSV News regarding “La pasión mística: espiritualidad y sensualidad” (“Mystical Passion: Spirituality and Sensuality“), published in 1998 while he was still a priest in Argentina.

The DDF prefect told OSV News that he bought “the few copies that were available in some bookstores and destroyed them.”

Unbelievable!

Now, read the whole story: https://www.oursundayvisitor.com/cardinal-fernandez-says-he-destroyed-remaining-copies-of-book-he-hails-inconvenient-by-current-standards/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_email=Omeda&utm_campaign=NL-Our+Sunday+Visitor+News+Now&utm_term=2460E8039934D7W&oly_enc_id=2460E8039934D7W

CARDINAL FERNANDEZ RESPONDS TO UPROAR OVER SEXUALLY EXPLICIT BOOK: “I CERTAINLY WOULD NOT WRITE (THAT) NOW”

I’m fairly sure I never expected to post or write about or even try to explain this news that broke yesterday! A stunning story about one of the top figures in the Roman Curia! Just reading about it left me breathless, head filled with a dozen questions.

If I had not known the sources, I might have shrugged this off as some kind of wicked satire!  But reading it in Catholic News Agency, OSV (Our Sunday Visitor), Breitbart News, The Pillar and Crux left me shaking my head. Stunned reaction continues to arrive on social media.

You also need good news, great news, in fact, so here it is: 8 Children receive 1st Communion in Gaza: Such beautiful kids! https://aleteia.org/2024/01/08/8-children-receive-1st-communion-in-gaza-beautiful-kids/

CARDINAL FERNANDEZ RESPONDS TO UPROAR OVER SEXUALLY EXPLICIT BOOK: “I CERTAINLY WOULD NOT WRITE (THAT) NOW”

Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, one of the most powerful men in the Vatican, responded to criticism about a book he wrote in the 1990s on spirituality and sensuality, noting that he cancelled the book shortly after its publication.

(CNA January 8, 2024) – Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, one of the most powerful men in the Vatican, responded to criticism about a book he wrote in the 1990s on spirituality and sensuality. (Argentinian prelate Víctor Manuel Fernández. | Credit: Tiziana Fabi/AFP via Getty Images)

“I certainly would not write [that] now,” Cardinal Fernández, who serves as the prefect for the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, told Crux noting that he had written the book when he was younger.

“Long after that book I wrote much more serious ones like The Healing Force of Mysticism and The Transforming Force of Mysticism,” Cardinal Fernández told Crux.

The cardinal noted that he cancelled the sexually themed book shortly after its publication and “never allowed it to be reprinted.” He added that he wrote it for young couples “who wanted to better understand the spiritual meaning of their relationships” but then realized it “could be misinterpreted.”

“That’s why I don’t think it’s a good thing to spread it now,” Cardinal Fernández said. “In fact, I have not authorized it and it is contrary to my will.”

The 1998 book depicts an imaginary sensual interaction between Christ and a teenager, relates human orgasm to divine intimacy, and speaks about illicit sexual activities done in a way “without being guilty and without losing the grace of God or the experience of his love.”

In the seventh chapter of the book, Fernández addresses the topic of pornography and sexual arousal, saying that “a woman … is less attracted than a man to watching photos containing violent sexual scenes, orgies, images, etc. This does not mean that she feels less aroused by hardcore pornography, but rather that she enjoys and values this less.”

The text goes on to discuss “the possibility of reaching a kind of fulfilling orgasm in our relationship with God, which does not imply so much physical alterations, but simply that God manages to touch the soul-corporeal center of pleasure, so that a satisfaction that encompasses the entire person is experienced.”

Earlier, in the sixth chapter, the book describes “an experience of love, a passionate encounter with Jesus, that a sixteen-year-old-teenager [girl] told me about.” The text discusses an encounter with Christ at the Sea of Galilee as he bathes and lies in the sand. It includes a lengthy description of kissing and caressing his body from head to toe as the Blessed Mother stands by and approvingly allows the encounter to take place.

This is not the first time Cardinal Fernández has faced scrutiny for sexually explicit texts. Last year, his earlier 1995 book Heal Me With Your Mouth: The Art of Kissing resurfaced, which also contained erotic themes. He also defended that book, saying at the time that it was “a pastor’s catechesis for teens” and “not a theology book.”

In mid-December 2023, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, which is led by Cardinal Fernández, published a declaration that permits priests to impart “spontaneous” pastoral blessings for “same-sex couples” and other couples in “irregular situations.” However, it does not allow liturgical blessings, recognition of civil unions, or any actions that would make the blessings appear like a marriage.

The declaration has received mixed reactions from bishops around the world, with African bishops delivering some of the most fierce criticism.

Also from CNA: https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/256470/cardinal-victor-fernandez-book-sexual-themes-vatican-doctrine

CARDINAL FERNANDEZ’ INTERVIEW WITH GERMAN PAPER ON “SYNODAL WAY”

CARDINAL FERNANDEZ’ INTERVIEW WITH GERMAN PAPER ON “SYNODAL WAY”

The following is from the Pillar’s January 4 Starting Seven Starting Seven | The Pillar (pillarcatholic.com). If you do not subscribe to the Pillar and do not also get the daily bulletin Starting Seven, you are really losing out on a terrific news site. You can count on accuracy and clarity with every report that comes out of The Pillar. I felt this piece was important because what we should expect from a prefect of the most important dicastery of the Catholic Church, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith is total clarity and that is not what we have been hearing and reading. You might have seen my earlier post today (DICASTERY ISSUES CLARIFICATION OF FIDUCIA SUPPLICANS | Joan’s Rome (wordpress.com)

Look closer

More ‘pastoral developments’?  Initial reports on Cardinal Víctor Manuel “Tucho” Fernández’s interview with Germany’s Die Tagespost newspaper focused on the Vatican doctrine czar’s criticisms of the country’s “synodal way.”

Fernández did indeed offer some sharp words about the German initiative’s perceived elitism.

  • He said: “When you hear some of the reflections that have been made in the context of the German synodal path, it sometimes seems as if one part of the world feels particularly ‘enlightened’ in order to understand what the other poor wretches are unable to grasp because they are closed or medieval, and then this ‘enlightened’ part naively believes that thanks to it the whole universal Church will be reformed and freed from the old schemes.”

But when the full interview was published Wednesday, another remark jumped out.

Excluded topics  Fernández, who was appointed prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith in July, spoke about talks that are due to take place between German bishops and Vatican officials in January, April, and June this year.

He noted that the Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin had written to H\the German bishops in October, enclosing a “Nota” from the doctrine office ruling out two topics from the conversations: women priests and Church teaching on homosexual acts.

But Fernández then made a comment that is likely to raise eyebrows around the Catholic world.

  • “But after it was said that two topics would not be discussed, the door remains open for the discussion of the other questions,” the cardinal said. “Not to move towards a liberal answer, but perhaps to find a better understanding anda pastoral development similar to that on the blessing of irregular couples [my italics].”

The cardinal added: “So let us move forward in dialogue on these topics, which, as the ‘Nota’ says, may have aspects that cannot be reformed, but also some that can be deepened. And let’s not waste time on the two topics that have been excluded.”

Germany’s ‘other questions’  What are the “other questions” raised by the synodal way? They are many and various.

At five synodal assemblies from 2020 to 2023, participants produced 150 pages of resolutions calling for, among other things, women deacons, a re-examination of priestly celibacy, regular lay baptisms, lay preaching at Masses, an official handout with a text for same-sex blessings, a revision of the Catechism on homosexuality, and a greater lay role in choosing bishops.

Could some of these topics be subject to a “pastoral development” along the lines of Fiducia supplicans? That is a prospect that Cardinal Fernández has himself just raised.

Tucho and triangulation  There are a seemingly infinite number of ways to interpret Fiducia supplicans. One way is to see it as Rome’s response to questions raised by the blessings of same-sex couples in Belgium and Germany.

In the Die Tagespost interview, Fernández said that there was “now a clear answer to this that bears the pope’s signature.”

  • “It is not the answer that one would like to have in two or three countries,” he said. “Rather, it is a pastoral answer that everyone could accept, albeit with difficulty. And so the Church is growing in its pastoral ministry without this being a rupture for some parts of the world, a disregard for hundreds of years of reflection guided by the Holy Spirit.”

Observers might see this as a form of “triangulation” — a political strategy in which a leader presents an idea as being either between or above the opposing positions of the “left” and “right.” It often involves the partial adoption of the contending ideas, followed by their reformulation.

How might this work with the synodal way? The initiative endorsed lay preaching at Masses, while canon law says that the homily is “reserved to a priest or deacon.” It might be possible to triangulate the two positions by adding a clause to canon law saying that the homily is “reserved to a priest or deacon, unless pastoral reasons suggest otherwise.”

This is a crude example, presented only to convey a general idea. There is no evidence that the Vatican is considering this, especially as it recently ruled out the synodal way’s demand for lay homilists.

It is also worth underlining that the triangulation theory is only one among many and may not be Fernández’s strategy at all. But it might be worth bearing in mind as one possibile interpretation as the Rome-Germany talks unfold.