THE BONES OF THE FISHERMAN (CONT’D)

THE BONES OF THE FISHERMAN (CONT’D)

This column is a follow-up to my July 3 column entitled, “THOSE 9 BONE FRAGMENTS THAT POPE MONTINI WANTED BY HIS SIDE,” a reference to the bone fragments of St. Peter, the first Pope, that have been in a reliquary in the papal chapel in the Apostolic Palace since Paul VI announced on June 26, 1968, “New, very thorough and very accurate inquiries were later carried out with the result that, comforted by the judgment of skillful, prudent and competent persons, we believe the following to be positive: that even the relics of St. Peter have been identified in a convincing manner for which we give praise to those who have committed themselves to very careful study with long and great effort.” (https://joansrome.wordpress.com/2019/07/03/)

In that column, I wrote that in the early years I was working at the Vatican, I had been told by a monsignor working in the Roman Curia and knowledgeable about archives, that those bone fragments were the only remains of our first Pope. I wrote that, if true, I could not believe the Holy Father had given them away!

Those were not, as I have since happily discovered, the only bone fragments of St. Peter. Others are in the scavi, the excavations decades ago that led to the discovery of Peter’s tomb and bones. What was so strange for me was that I have visited the scavi a number of times (though not in the past 10 or more years) and never remember hearing a guide telling us the saint’s bones were in a reliquary/container near his tomb. How could you forget something like that!

On July 6, Vatican news published an interview in Italian with Prof. Pietro Zander head of the Vatican necropolis office (the scavi), and head of the conservation and restoration of the artistic heritage of the Fabbrica di San Pietro, the Vatican office charged with anything and everything that has to do with St. Peter’s Basilica such as building, repairing, restoring, administering, etc.

“On this box,” said Zander, referring to the reliquary that Francis gave to the Orthodox Patriarch Bartholomew, “there is an inscription that states that it is part of the bones that were considered to have belonged to San Peter. The relics donated by the Holy Father, therefore, come from a more conspicuous group of bones that are still preserved in the compartment of the so-called ‘Muro G’ (Wall G), the graffiti wall that is located under the papal altar of the Vatican Basilica. Precisely in that place, June 26, 1968, Paul VI wanted to place as many as 19 transparent cases with bone fragments that belonged to the first Pope. Only nine fragments were then removed from this group which were taken to the private chapel of the papal apartment of the Apostolic Palace, to be available for the intentions and the will of the Holy Father.” (JFL photo)

It goes without saying that I hope to visit the scavi again and learn more about the remaining bone fragments.

I also wrote on July 3: “I think what breaks my heart is that the 9 bone fragments given to the Orthodox, prayerfully cared for over the years in a reliquary in the papal chapel, were whisked out of the Vatican without any pre-announcement, on what I dare call a papal whim. I am guessing Francis did pray over this surprise gesture, hoping it might cement relations with East and West, the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church.

“I would have loved – and I believe millions would have kept me company – to have seen these relics up close and personal. To pray over them, to relish the closeness to St. Peter to whom Jesus gave the Keys of the Kingdom, Peter our first Pope, our first Holy Father, a man who spent three years on earth so close to Jesus, Son of the Father!

“Would it not have been a splendid gesture to have dedicated a period of several months to a public display of these relics before they were sent off to Istanbul?!”

In the days since June 29, I have read myriad news reports and opinion pieces on the papal gift to the Orthodox Church. Tons of questions cropped up in those reports and in many conversations with people as consternated as I was about the gift (when I thought they were the only bones of Peter): Did the Pope have the right to do this (seems he did, according to Canon 1190)? Why did he not give several of the fragments now in the scavi to Bartholomew instead? Will Orthodox patriarchs other than Bartholomew I of Constantinople want to receive bone fragments? Will legitimate requests for relics arrive from Catholics?

Many mourned the idea that no Pope in the future can pray before these relics in the papal chapel as did Paul VI, probably John Paul I, for sure John Paul II and Benedict XVI. After all, as Pope, they were all Successors of Peter, Prince of the Apostles.

Read on to hear what Pope Francis told the Orthodox delegation about that papal chapel.

Lifesitenews reported on the June 29 gift of 9 bone fragments of St. Peter from Pope Francis to the Orthodox Church and quoted remarks by Archbishop Job of Telmessos, who headed the official delegation of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople to the June 29 ceremony in St. Peter’s (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-gives-away-relics-of-st-peter).

Those remarks by the Orthodox archbishop were originally reported on the following website under the: ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE PERMANENT DELEGATION TO THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES https://www.ecupatria.org/2019/07/01/pope-francis-of-rome-gave-relics-of-saint-peter-to-the-church-of-constantinople/

Here is the essential part of that account:

“On 29 June, 2019, after the Papal Mass in the Basilica of St. Peter, His Holiness Pope Francis invited him (Job) to descend to the tomb of St. Peter under the main altar. They prayed together and the Pope then told him that he had ‘a gift for the Church of Constantinople’, not indicating what he intended, and invited him to accompany him to the Apostolic Palace. In the private chapel of the popes, he took the reliquary into his hands and handed it to Archbishop Job.

“When we entered the chapel,” said Archbishop Job, “Pope Francis explained to me that Pope Paul VI wanted to keep a part of the relics of St. Peter from the Vatican Basilica in his private chapel. Further, Pope Francis told him that during the prayer the previous evening he had this thought: ‘I no longer live in the Apostolic Palace, I never use this chapel, I never serve the Holy Mass here, and we have St. Peter’s relics in the basilica itself, so it will be better if they will be kept in Constantinople. This is my gift to the Church of Constantinople. Please take this reliquary and give it to my brother Patriarch Bartholomew. This gift is not from me, it is a gift from God’.”

“Archbishop Job admitted that this decision of Pope Francis was a surprise to everyone: ‘This is an extraordinary and unexpected event that we did not expect. The relics of the Holy Apostle Peter were always kept in Rome where they were the purpose of pilgrimages. The Orthodox Church has never asked for them since they never belonged to the Church of Constantinople. This time, we do not speak of a return of relics to their original place. This time, the relics are being presented as a gift. This prophetic gesture is another huge step on the path to concrete unity,’ stressed Archbishop Job of Telmessos.”

I have to be honest. I was stunned, to say the least, by the Pope’s words about the papal chapel in the Apostolic Palace, as if it too was a relic that could be discarded.

I’ve been to papal Masses in that chapel when St. John Paul celebrated the Eucharist. It is small, intimate, beautiful and conducive to being recollected and prayerful.

As I wrote for the book, “When Women Pray”: “On several occasions I was blessed to be at Mass in John Paul’s private chapel and I can only say I will not live long enough to ever again encounter a person who prayed like John Paul did. He was always at prayer when we entered the chapel and you felt instantly that he was unaware of our presence because he was totally aware of another Presence. I sensed something mystical as I watched him pray. I could almost hear the conversation he was having with God or, quite likely, his Blessed Mother whom he loved so much! Those images were seared into my soul!”

I only wish I’d known then about the reliquary!

EWTN DEBUTS IN MACAU TODAY

EWTN DEBUTS IN MACAU TODAY

I saw this story in macaunews.com and had it confirmed by EWTN Alabama! Seems July will be a test period in preparation for an August launch so I hope all goes well in Macau!

Macau Cable Television Company Limited (MCTV) and Eternal World Television Network (EWTN) will announce today the beginning of EWTN broadcast in Macau.

Details of the project will be announced by Edwin Lopez, International Marketing Manager of EWTN for Asia-Pacific, and José Miguel Encarnação, EWTN Media Cooperator for Macau.

EWTN was founded in 1981 by Mother Angelica, a poor St. Clare nun, in Alabama, United States. In its 38th year, it is today the largest religious media network in the world. Its 11 networks broadcast in multiple languages 24 hours a day, seven days a week to over 290 million television households in more than 145 countries and territories.

Platforms include direct broadcast satellite television and more than 6,000 television affiliates as well as ROKU, Apple TV, Amazon Fire and multiple social media platforms.

Radio services are transmitted through SIRIUS/XM, iHeart Radio, over 500 domestic and international AM & FM radio affiliates and a worldwide shortwave radio station.

EWTN also owns news services such as National Catholic Register (NCR), Catholic News Agency (CNA) and Church Pop.

The Macau Cable TV will broadcast EWTN on channel 28.(Macaunews)

EWTN to be broadcasted in Macau

NUNCIO IN FRANCE COOPERATES WITH AUTHORITIES, RENOUNCES DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY

NUNCIO IN FRANCE COOPERATES WITH AUTHORITIES, RENOUNCES DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY

Responding to questions from journalists, interim director of the Holy See Press Office, Alessandro Gisotti, stated the following:

“I can confirm that the Holy See renounces jurisdictional immunity enjoyed by the Apostolic Nuncio in France, Msgr. Luigi Ventura, by virtue of the Vienna Convention of 18 April 1961 on diplomatic relations, for the purposes of criminal proceedings concerning him.

“This is an extraordinary gesture that confirms the will of the Nuncio, expressed from the beginning of the story, to collaborate fully and spontaneously with the French judicial authorities, competent for the case. In order to take this decision, the Holy See awaited the conclusion of the preliminary phase of the procedure – communicated to it at the end of June – in which Msgr. Ventura has freely participated. The Holy See’s decision was officially communicated to the French authorities last week.”

ITALIAN PROSECCO REGION NOW A UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE SITE

‘Tis the season to consume a chilled Prosecco wherever you are – poolside in Honolulu, in an air-conditioned restaurant in DesMoines, on the shores of Lake Como in Northern Italy or sharing a late night dinner outside a Roman trattoria cooled by summer evening breezes.

And, as of yesterday, there was further reason to enjoy – and rejoice over – Italy’s famed Prosecco!

ITALIAN PROSECCO REGION NOW A UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE SITE

Congrats to Italian wine makers! Salute!

On Sunday, July 7, reports ANSA, the Italian news agency, the Prosecco Hills of Conegliano and Valdobbiadene on Sunday became a UNESCO world heritage site.

The announcement was made by the World Heritage Committee in Baku.

The 97-square kilometres of vine-clad slopes and borghi on the left side of the Piave River thus became the 8th site in Veneto and the 55th in Italy to make the UNESCO list.

“A unique place of value has been recognized,” said Foreign Minister Enzo Moavero Milanesi and Veneto Governor Luca Zaia.

Located in northeastern Italy, the site includes part of the vine-growing landscape of the Prosecco wine production area. The landscape is characterized by ‘hogback’ hills, ciglioni – small plots of vines on narrow grassy terraces – forests, small villages and farmland.

 ANSA/ANDREA MEROLA

For centuries, this rugged terrain has been shaped and adapted by man. Since the 17th century, the use of ciglioni has created a particular checkerboard landscape consisting of rows of vines parallel and vertical to the slopes.

In the 19th century, the bellussera technique of training the vines contributed to the aesthetic characteristics of the landscape.

With the addition of the Prosecco Hills, Italy extended its lead in the UNESCO rankings over China, Spain, and France.

JFL: I also read a few days ago in http://www.thelocal.it that there is another terrific Italian sparkling wine that is lesser known than Prosecco and that is Franciacorta DOCG. This is made using what wine makers call il metodo classico (classic method).

As thelocal.it explained: “il metodo classico is the same method that champagne uses – a second fermentation in the bottle. Franciacorta by law has a longer minimum time for this than champagne; 24 months as opposed to 18, and comes from the shores of the Iseo Lake in the southern part of Lombardy. The grapes allowed are Pinot Nero, Pinot Bianco and Chardonnay.”

PS – there is a still (non sparkling) version of Prosecco called Prosecco spento